Celtic vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Average
Good
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,871,603 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to a decrease of 20.2 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

Celtic vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $128,140, a difference of 38.9%), median household income ($83,193 compared to $111,519, a difference of 34.1%), and median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $49,818, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 6.8%), householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $71,567, a difference of 18.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $62,083, a difference of 23.1%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
Income MetricCelticImmigrants from Hong Kong
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Exceptional
$56,709
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Exceptional
$131,067
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Exceptional
$111,519
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Exceptional
$59,433
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Exceptional
$70,146
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Exceptional
$49,818
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Exceptional
$62,083
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Exceptional
$128,140
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Exceptional
$127,500
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Exceptional
$71,567
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Good
25.5%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 44.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 40.0%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 16.6%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticImmigrants from Hong Kong
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Average
13.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
17.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Exceptional
12.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
16.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
24.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
9.1%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticImmigrants from Hong Kong
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 35.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.1%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticImmigrants from Hong Kong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Tragic
30.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Tragic
71.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.6%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 41.2%), divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.9%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.8% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (63.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.7%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticImmigrants from Hong Kong
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
66.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
23.6%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 40.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 12.6%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Tragic
52.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Fair
19.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Good
6.5%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 65.6%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 47.1%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.24%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Tragic
94.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Average
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Exceptional
55.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Exceptional
48.2%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.8%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 76.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 56.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.7%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 7.0%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
Disability MetricCelticImmigrants from Hong Kong
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
8.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
19.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%