Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,923,152 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.486. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 9.6 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,341 compared to $128,140, a difference of 57.5%), median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $70,146, a difference of 51.7%), and per capita income ($37,550 compared to $56,709, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 13.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $62,083, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $71,567, a difference of 32.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 78.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 77.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 16.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 49.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 35.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 63.3%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 59.9%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 99.8%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 86.1%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 75.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.94%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 41.7%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.9%).