Slavic vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,631,854 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.097. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 6.5 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $128,140, a difference of 33.0%), median household income ($86,398 compared to $111,519, a difference of 29.1%), and per capita income ($45,049 compared to $56,709, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 7.5%), householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $71,567, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $62,083, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 36.6%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 27.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.2%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and poverty (11.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 32.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 34.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.7%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (64.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 26.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 63.8%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 45.8%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.7% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.81%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 48.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 42.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.72%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 4.0%).