Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,039,328 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Cheyenne communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.271. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cheyenne within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cheyenne corresponds to a decrease of 21.0 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,362 compared to $127,500, a difference of 67.0%), median household income ($66,974 compared to $111,519, a difference of 66.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,152 compared to $128,140, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 9.5%), householder income over 65 years ($54,096 compared to $71,567, a difference of 32.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,275 compared to $62,083, a difference of 37.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (28.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 127.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (26.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 113.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (25.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 110.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 15.9%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (10.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 133.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (16.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 128.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 92.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 24.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.8% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 75.4%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 67.3%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.68%), family households (63.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and average family size (3.47 compared to 3.26, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.040%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 82.1%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 80.5%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.48%), 11th grade (91.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and 9th grade (94.9% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 71.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 66.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.4%), disability age over 75 (50.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 11.0%).