Bermudan vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,195,497 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Bermudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.624. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bermudans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.458% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bermudans corresponds to an increase of 458.1 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,231 compared to $128,140, a difference of 45.2%), median household income ($80,406 compared to $111,519, a difference of 38.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,197 compared to $127,500, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 10.5%), householder income over 65 years ($58,171 compared to $71,567, a difference of 23.0%), and median female earnings ($39,418 compared to $49,818, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 54.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 47.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.58%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 49.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 46.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 50.7%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 50.6%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (62.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.3%), no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 50.4%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 46.9%), and master's degree (15.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.2% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 48.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.86%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.3%).