Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,346,749 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Nepal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nepal within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nepal corresponds to an increase of 59.0 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,322 compared to $128,140, a difference of 34.4%), per capita income ($44,187 compared to $56,709, a difference of 28.3%), and median household income ($87,046 compared to $111,519, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income over 65 years ($61,843 compared to $71,567, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,611 compared to $62,083, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 33.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 29.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.45%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 25.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.6%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 25.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (62.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.89%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 34.0%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.4%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.2% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 28.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.29%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.9%).