Immigrants from Nigeria vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,448,771 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Nigeria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.340. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nigeria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nigeria corresponds to an increase of 19.9 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,589 compared to $128,140, a difference of 48.0%), per capita income ($40,339 compared to $56,709, a difference of 40.6%), and median household income ($81,236 compared to $111,519, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 12.4%), householder income over 65 years ($58,942 compared to $71,567, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,174 compared to $62,083, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 52.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 51.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 41.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 62.1%), births to unmarried women (35.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 50.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.7%), family households (64.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.0%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.57%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 58.1%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 57.0%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.9% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (95.2% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and 5th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 39.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 32.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.46%), disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.8%).