Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Hong Kong
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,967,449 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.813. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.345% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 344.7 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $128,140, a difference of 64.4%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $111,519, a difference of 59.3%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $56,709, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 6.4%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $71,567, a difference of 33.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $62,083, a difference of 38.7%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $56,709 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $131,067 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $111,519 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $59,433 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $70,146 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $49,818 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $62,083 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $128,140 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $127,500 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $71,567 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Good 25.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 75.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 64.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 17.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 24.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 54.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.18%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Good 17.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 25.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 30.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 71.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 53.9%), single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 50.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (64.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Good 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 49.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 23.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 43.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 11.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 52.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Fair 19.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Good 6.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 90.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 83.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 79.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.10%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.1% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Average 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 71.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 55.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 48.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 20.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 96.5%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 83.8%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 76.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.2%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.6%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 0.95% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |