Russian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,924,154 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.254. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 10.1 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,398 compared to $128,140, a difference of 16.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $62,083, a difference of 14.1%), and median household income ($98,008 compared to $111,519, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $71,567, a difference of 5.8%), per capita income ($53,154 compared to $56,709, a difference of 6.7%), and median family income ($120,487 compared to $131,067, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 18.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.7%), male poverty (9.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and poverty (10.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 20.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 18.9%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.6% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.69%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.090%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 62.0%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and bachelor's degree (45.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (70.5% compared to 71.0%, a difference of 0.65%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 44.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.73%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.5%).