Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,319,335 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.334. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to a decrease of 25.3 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $128,140, a difference of 42.2%), per capita income ($42,164 compared to $56,709, a difference of 34.5%), and median household income ($83,582 compared to $111,519, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 14.3%), householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $62,083, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $71,567, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 54.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 54.1%), and receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 8.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 42.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 33.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 62.3%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 45.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.82%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (63.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 45.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 51.3%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 50.8%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 5th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and 8th grade (94.9% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 42.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 35.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.3%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.3%).