Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,583,889 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.512. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to a decrease of 25.6 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,569 compared to $128,140, a difference of 36.9%), per capita income ($41,678 compared to $56,709, a difference of 36.1%), and median male earnings ($53,661 compared to $70,146, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $71,567, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $62,083, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 32.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 31.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 25.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 40.8%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 37.5%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.71%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 41.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 72.2%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 68.6%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.24%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and high school diploma (88.9% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 49.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 37.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 6.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 12.0%).