Lebanese vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,541,531 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Lebanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lebanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lebanese corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,840 compared to $43,806, a difference of 4.6%), median family income ($107,086 compared to $103,273, a difference of 3.7%), and median household income ($88,091 compared to $84,965, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,355 compared to $51,224, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,339 compared to $95,070, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.0%), family poverty (8.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 8.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.080%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.8%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.96%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.5%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.2% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.56%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.3%).