Blackfeet vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,675,034 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.575. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.282% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 281.7 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,595 compared to $101,387, a difference of 17.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,531 compared to $95,070, a difference of 16.6%), and median family income ($88,717 compared to $103,273, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $51,224, a difference of 5.4%), median female earnings ($35,864 compared to $38,738, a difference of 8.0%), and median earnings ($41,822 compared to $46,658, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.7%), family poverty (11.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 40.7%), and receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.5%), single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and single male poverty (15.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.5%), female unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.4%), and unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 27.1%), births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 18.3%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 22.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 24.7%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.1%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.2%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and female disability (13.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.6%).