Immigrants from Portugal vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,799,596 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 5.0 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $60,581, a difference of 8.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $51,224, a difference of 5.6%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($84,740 compared to $84,965, a difference of 0.27%), median male earnings ($55,182 compared to $55,382, a difference of 0.36%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,512 compared to $95,070, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 38.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 28.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 2.6%), single female poverty (21.9% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.2%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.92%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 49.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 64.6%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 18.7%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.070%), male disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.3%).