Immigrants from Uganda vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,675,163 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to a decrease of 4.5 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 13.1%), median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $38,738, a difference of 5.2%), and median household income ($87,553 compared to $84,965, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,698 compared to $95,070, a difference of 0.66%), median male earnings ($56,064 compared to $55,382, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,584 compared to $101,387, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 17.5%), and receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 1.4%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.6%), married-couple households (44.6% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (62.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 27.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 20.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.7%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.5%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.60%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 24.0%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.47%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.3%).