Native Hawaiian vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,862,243 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.293. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 4.7 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $60,581, a difference of 17.2%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $51,224, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,058 compared to $95,070, a difference of 0.010%), median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $38,738, a difference of 0.72%), and median family income ($104,910 compared to $103,273, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 24.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.020%), female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.43 compared to 3.13, a difference of 9.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 32.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 14.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 18.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.50%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.92%).