Immigrants from Venezuela vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,626,423 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Venezuela communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.503. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Venezuela within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Venezuela corresponds to a decrease of 5.2 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,038 compared to $95,070, a difference of 9.2%), median family income ($94,904 compared to $103,273, a difference of 8.8%), and wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,109 compared to $51,224, a difference of 2.2%), median household income ($81,506 compared to $84,965, a difference of 4.2%), and median female earnings ($37,003 compared to $38,738, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 34.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 34.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.34%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.7% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 24.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.2%), family households with children (29.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 1.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 36.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 22.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.36%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 25.6%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and bachelor's degree (40.2% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 36.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.6%).