Argentinean vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Argentinean
Czechoslovakian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Argentineans
Czechoslovakians
8,055
SOCIAL INDEX
78.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
90th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czechoslovakian Integration in Argentinean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,337,477 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 44.6 Czechoslovakians.
Argentinean vs Czechoslovakian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $43,806, a difference of 13.8%), median household income ($93,960 compared to $84,965, a difference of 10.6%), and median family income ($112,665 compared to $103,273, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $51,224, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $60,581, a difference of 7.7%).
Income Metric | Argentinean | Czechoslovakian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,862 | Average $43,806 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,665 | Average $103,273 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,960 | Average $84,965 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,399 | Average $46,658 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,117 | Good $55,382 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,952 | Poor $38,738 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,154 | Tragic $51,224 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $103,111 | Average $95,070 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $110,103 | Good $101,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,246 | Average $60,581 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 28.2% |
Argentinean vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 23.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.3%), poverty (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty (12.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Poverty Metric | Argentinean | Czechoslovakian |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Excellent 8.4% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Excellent 12.8% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.4% | Good 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Good 16.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Fair 21.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.2% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Argentinean vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Argentinean | Czechoslovakian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Argentinean vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 25.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.41%).
Labor Participation Metric | Argentinean | Czechoslovakian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.3% | Exceptional 41.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.1% | Exceptional 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Good 83.0% |
Argentinean vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.3%), births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.53%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Argentinean | Czechoslovakian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Excellent 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 30.0% | Fair 32.0% |
Argentinean vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 43.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 14.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Argentinean | Czechoslovakian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.5% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Argentinean vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 40.8%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 27.9%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.51%).
Education Level Metric | Argentinean | Czechoslovakian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.8% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.6% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.5% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.7% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.4% | Good 65.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.2% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.2% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.2% | Fair 14.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Fair 1.8% |
Argentinean vs Czechoslovakian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 29.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.9%).
Disability Metric | Argentinean | Czechoslovakian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Exceptional 46.6% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Average 2.5% |