Cajun vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,449,999 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Cajun communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cajuns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cajuns corresponds to an increase of 32.2 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cajun and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,015 compared to $101,387, a difference of 22.1%), median household income ($70,605 compared to $84,965, a difference of 20.3%), and wage/income gap (33.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,325 compared to $55,382, a difference of 5.8%), median earnings ($42,189 compared to $46,658, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,338 compared to $51,224, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cajun and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 48.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (22.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 46.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 25.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 28.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cajun and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cajun and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cajun and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 27.9%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.7%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.20%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 19.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cajun and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 32.3%), bachelor's degree (29.6% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 24.9%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%), 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 30.1%), and ambulatory disability (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.2%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age over 75 (50.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 8.7%).