Osage vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Osage
Czechoslovakian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Osage
Czechoslovakians
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czechoslovakian Integration in Osage Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,177,870 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 15.2 Czechoslovakians.
Osage vs Czechoslovakian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $101,387, a difference of 14.7%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $84,965, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $95,070, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $38,738, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $60,581, a difference of 8.8%).
Income Metric | Osage | Czechoslovakian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,568 | Average $43,806 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,926 | Average $103,273 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,240 | Average $84,965 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,651 | Average $46,658 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,292 | Good $55,382 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,034 | Poor $38,738 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,764 | Tragic $51,224 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,461 | Average $95,070 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,390 | Good $101,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,677 | Average $60,581 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 28.2% |
Osage vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.2%), single male poverty (16.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.4%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.5%).
Poverty Metric | Osage | Czechoslovakian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Good 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.6% | Good 16.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 24.4% | Fair 21.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.6% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Osage vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Osage | Czechoslovakian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.5% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Osage vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Osage | Czechoslovakian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.0% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.0% | Exceptional 41.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.3% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.3% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Good 83.0% |
Osage vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.6%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 0.090%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Osage | Czechoslovakian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Excellent 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.5% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.4% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.1% | Fair 32.0% |
Osage vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Osage | Czechoslovakian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.8% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.7% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Osage vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 15.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%).
Education Level Metric | Osage | Czechoslovakian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.8% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.7% | Good 65.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.8% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.5% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.0% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Fair 14.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.7% | Fair 1.8% |
Osage vs Czechoslovakian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.9%), vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.0%).
Disability Metric | Osage | Czechoslovakian |
Disability | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.5% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Exceptional 46.6% |
Vision | Tragic 2.7% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Average 2.5% |