Immigrants from Australia vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 188,682,738 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.756. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.759% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 758.9 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $43,806, a difference of 32.3%), median family income ($126,620 compared to $103,273, a difference of 22.6%), and median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $55,382, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.060%), householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $51,224, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $60,581, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 14.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.7%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.74%), male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and poverty (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 20.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.060%), currently married (47.3% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 76.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 64.1%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 56.4%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.6%).