Immigrants from the Azores vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from the Azores
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from the Azores

Czechoslovakians

Poor
Good
1,552
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
302nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czechoslovakian Integration in Immigrants from the Azores Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,209,666 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from the Azores communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from the Azores within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from the Azores corresponds to an increase of 1.2 Czechoslovakians.
Immigrants from the Azores Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

Immigrants from the Azores vs Czechoslovakian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,121 compared to $60,581, a difference of 16.2%), per capita income ($39,608 compared to $43,806, a difference of 10.6%), and median family income ($95,402 compared to $103,273, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,573 compared to $38,738, a difference of 0.43%), median earnings ($45,812 compared to $46,658, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,621 compared to $51,224, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Czechoslovakian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCzechoslovakian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,608
Average
$43,806
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,402
Average
$103,273
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,357
Average
$84,965
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,812
Average
$46,658
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,503
Good
$55,382
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,573
Poor
$38,738
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,621
Tragic
$51,224
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,322
Average
$95,070
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,138
Good
$101,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,121
Average
$60,581
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
28.2%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Czechoslovakian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 59.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 39.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.5%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and single mother poverty (32.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 8.3%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCzechoslovakian
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
10.3%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Good
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.8%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.9%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
23.5%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.2%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
10.3%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 36.8%), male unemployment (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.7%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCzechoslovakian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.1%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.2%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCzechoslovakian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.8%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Exceptional
41.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.5%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.1%
Good
83.0%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 28.0%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 23.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.18%), family households (65.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCzechoslovakian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.1%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.6%
Fair
32.0%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 23.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 6.1%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCzechoslovakian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.4%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Czechoslovakian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 87.5%), professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.8%), and master's degree (10.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCzechoslovakian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.2%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.7%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
48.4%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
35.6%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
27.3%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.2%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Czechoslovakian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.8%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 4.6%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.1%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Czechoslovakian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCzechoslovakian
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.9%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Average
2.5%