Pueblo vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pueblo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pueblo

Czechoslovakians

Poor
Good
2,100
SOCIAL INDEX
18.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
270th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czechoslovakian Integration in Pueblo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,655,350 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Pueblo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.279. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pueblo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pueblo corresponds to a decrease of 8.4 Czechoslovakians.
Pueblo Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

Pueblo vs Czechoslovakian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($68,910 compared to $95,070, a difference of 38.0%), per capita income ($32,012 compared to $43,806, a difference of 36.8%), and wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,018 compared to $51,224, a difference of 13.8%), householder income over 65 years ($52,930 compared to $60,581, a difference of 14.5%), and median female earnings ($32,564 compared to $38,738, a difference of 19.0%).
Pueblo vs Czechoslovakian Income
Income MetricPuebloCzechoslovakian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$32,012
Average
$43,806
Median Family Income
Tragic
$76,880
Average
$103,273
Median Household Income
Tragic
$64,692
Average
$84,965
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,859
Average
$46,658
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$41,314
Good
$55,382
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,564
Poor
$38,738
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,018
Tragic
$51,224
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$68,910
Average
$95,070
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$75,601
Good
$101,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,930
Average
$60,581
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.7%
Tragic
28.2%

Pueblo vs Czechoslovakian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 155.6%), family poverty (17.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 112.3%), and receiving food stamps (19.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 93.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (21.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 23.7%), single mother poverty (37.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 25.1%), and single female poverty (28.6% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 34.2%).
Pueblo vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
Poverty MetricPuebloCzechoslovakian
Poverty
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
26.9%
Good
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
22.2%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.7%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.2%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
28.6%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
37.2%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
10.3%

Pueblo vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 70.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 56.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.6%).
Pueblo vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPuebloCzechoslovakian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.4%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
7.1%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.1%

Pueblo vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (80.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 8.6%).
Pueblo vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPuebloCzechoslovakian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
72.6%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
41.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.9%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.0%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.4%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.5%
Good
83.0%

Pueblo vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (53.7% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 67.5%), single father households (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 42.3%), and currently married (38.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.7%), family households (68.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.2%).
Pueblo vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPuebloCzechoslovakian
Family Households
Exceptional
68.2%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.0%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.79
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.3%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
38.2%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
53.7%
Fair
32.0%

Pueblo vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 37.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 6.0%).
Pueblo vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPuebloCzechoslovakian
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.1%

Pueblo vs Czechoslovakian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (25.5% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 44.9%), master's degree (10.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 41.2%), and associate's degree (34.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%).
Pueblo vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
Education Level MetricPuebloCzechoslovakian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.5%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.4%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.5%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
34.0%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
25.5%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.3%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Fair
1.8%

Pueblo vs Czechoslovakian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (33.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 43.8%), and self-care disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and female disability (14.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 10.8%).
Pueblo vs Czechoslovakian Disability
Disability MetricPuebloCzechoslovakian
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
33.1%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.9%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.6%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.3%
Average
2.5%