Ghanaian vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Czechoslovakian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ghanaians
Czechoslovakians
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czechoslovakian Integration in Ghanaian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,660,706 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.530. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.072% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 71.7 Czechoslovakians.
Ghanaian vs Czechoslovakian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 26.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $95,070, a difference of 5.5%), and median male earnings ($52,810 compared to $55,382, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($46,440 compared to $46,658, a difference of 0.47%), householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $60,581, a difference of 0.90%), and median household income ($83,582 compared to $84,965, a difference of 1.7%).
Income Metric | Ghanaian | Czechoslovakian |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,164 | Average $43,806 |
Median Family Income | Poor $98,877 | Average $103,273 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,582 | Average $84,965 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,440 | Average $46,658 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,810 | Good $55,382 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,429 | Poor $38,738 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,594 | Tragic $51,224 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $90,137 | Average $95,070 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $97,277 | Good $101,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $60,043 | Average $60,581 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 28.2% |
Ghanaian vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 35.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 31.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.95%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
Poverty Metric | Ghanaian | Czechoslovakian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Good 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.4% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Good 16.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Fair 21.3% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.7% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.4% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Ghanaian vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 25.4%), female unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.1%), and male unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Ghanaian | Czechoslovakian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Ghanaian vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.41%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ghanaian | Czechoslovakian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Exceptional 41.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.3% | Exceptional 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Good 83.0% |
Ghanaian vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.3%), married-couple households (42.2% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and currently married (42.9% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Ghanaian | Czechoslovakian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Excellent 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.2% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.9% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.3% | Fair 32.0% |
Ghanaian vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 110.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 35.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 10.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 24.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 32.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ghanaian | Czechoslovakian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 48.0% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Ghanaian vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 57.8%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and ged/equivalency (84.3% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (45.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.37%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Ghanaian | Czechoslovakian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.8% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.5% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.7% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.3% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 63.9% | Good 65.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.4% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.0% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Fair 14.5% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.3% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Ghanaian vs Czechoslovakian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 39.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.2%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Disability Metric | Ghanaian | Czechoslovakian |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.1% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.5% | Exceptional 46.6% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Average 2.5% |