Immigrants from Thailand vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Thailand
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Thailand

Czechoslovakians

Fair
Good
3,353
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
224th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czechoslovakian Integration in Immigrants from Thailand Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 246,224,636 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to an increase of 10.3 Czechoslovakians.
Immigrants from Thailand Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

Immigrants from Thailand vs Czechoslovakian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 14.9%), median male earnings ($52,908 compared to $55,382, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,337 compared to $95,070, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,810 compared to $38,738, a difference of 0.19%), householder income over 65 years ($60,217 compared to $60,581, a difference of 0.60%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,645 compared to $51,224, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Czechoslovakian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ThailandCzechoslovakian
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,289
Average
$43,806
Median Family Income
Poor
$99,840
Average
$103,273
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,327
Average
$84,965
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,598
Average
$46,658
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,908
Good
$55,382
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,810
Poor
$38,738
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,645
Tragic
$51,224
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,337
Average
$95,070
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,400
Good
$101,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$60,217
Average
$60,581
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.5%
Tragic
28.2%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Czechoslovakian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.3%), family poverty (9.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 0.40%), single female poverty (22.0% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ThailandCzechoslovakian
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Good
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.3%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
10.3%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.60%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ThailandCzechoslovakian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.8%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.50%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ThailandCzechoslovakian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
41.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.4%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Good
83.0%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and currently married (45.4% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and births to unmarried women (32.8% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ThailandCzechoslovakian
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.4%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.8%
Fair
32.0%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ThailandCzechoslovakian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Czechoslovakian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 66.6%), ged/equivalency (84.5% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and high school diploma (88.0% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ThailandCzechoslovakian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.5%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.7%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.1%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.5%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.2%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Czechoslovakian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.2%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Czechoslovakian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ThailandCzechoslovakian
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.3%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.3%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.5%