Navajo vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,592,424 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 0.3 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $43,806, a difference of 50.9%), median family income ($70,989 compared to $103,273, a difference of 45.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $101,387, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $38,738, a difference of 17.2%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $51,224, a difference of 20.9%), and wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 172.5%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 135.1%), and male poverty (22.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 115.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 35.2%), single female poverty (31.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 48.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 51.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 105.0%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 98.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 95.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 30.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 60.7%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 50.3%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.42%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (66.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 56.7%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 53.9%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.48%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 44.9%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.3%).