Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,026,787 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia corresponds to an increase of 9.9 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($46,187 compared to $51,224, a difference of 10.9%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and median family income ($108,544 compared to $103,273, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,450 compared to $95,070, a difference of 0.40%), median male earnings ($56,452 compared to $55,382, a difference of 1.9%), and median earnings ($47,704 compared to $46,658, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 26.5%), male poverty (12.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 22.5%), and poverty (13.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.050%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.77%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.8%), births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.48%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.74%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.6%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 41.1%), and master's degree (19.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.5% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.20%), high school diploma (90.7% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 29.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.71%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.2%).