Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 349,214,216 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.182. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $95,070, a difference of 24.2%), median household income ($104,796 compared to $84,965, a difference of 23.3%), and per capita income ($53,806 compared to $43,806, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $51,224, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $60,581, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 24.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 22.1%), and single female poverty (18.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.18%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 30.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 27.9%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.0%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.44%), married-couple households (48.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and currently married (48.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 73.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 65.4%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 56.1%), and no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 48.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 34.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.91%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.8%).