Pima vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,401,888 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.422. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 6.8 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $43,806, a difference of 42.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $101,387, a difference of 38.2%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $84,965, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,224, a difference of 0.55%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $38,738, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $95,070, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 162.2%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 129.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 119.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 15.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 29.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 42.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 158.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 130.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 107.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 12.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 79.8%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 60.7%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.20%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 80.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 59.5%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 56.9%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.22%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 67.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.4%).