Immigrants from Lebanon vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,149,866 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Lebanon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lebanon within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lebanon corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($91,887 compared to $84,965, a difference of 8.2%), per capita income ($46,938 compared to $43,806, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $101,387, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,729 compared to $51,224, a difference of 0.97%), wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and median male earnings ($58,835 compared to $55,382, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 50.8%), family poverty (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.79%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and single mother poverty (28.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 18.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 26.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.7%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.64%), currently married (48.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (65.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.74%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.2%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 29.8%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.5%).