Immigrants from Micronesia vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Czechoslovakian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Czechoslovakians
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czechoslovakian Integration in Immigrants from Micronesia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,843,802 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.285% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 285.1 Czechoslovakians.
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Czechoslovakian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $95,070, a difference of 18.0%), median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $55,382, a difference of 17.4%), and per capita income ($37,464 compared to $43,806, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $60,581, a difference of 0.69%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $51,224, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $38,738, a difference of 9.2%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Czechoslovakian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,464 | Average $43,806 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,345 | Average $103,273 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,574 | Average $84,965 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,133 | Average $46,658 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,177 | Good $55,382 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,477 | Poor $38,738 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,691 | Tragic $51,224 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,544 | Average $95,070 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,864 | Good $101,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,000 | Average $60,581 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.4% | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 31.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.2%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.6%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Czechoslovakian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Good 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.8% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Good 16.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.0% | Fair 21.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.6% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.4%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Czechoslovakian |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.5% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.1% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Average 8.9% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.75%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Czechoslovakian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.9% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Exceptional 41.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.8% | Exceptional 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.1% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.1% | Good 83.0% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.9%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.62%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.71%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Czechoslovakian |
Family Households | Average 64.2% | Excellent 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.2% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 32.9% | Fair 32.0% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Czechoslovakian |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.1% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.7% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 34.8%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.0%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.47%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Czechoslovakian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.6% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.5% | Good 65.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.8% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.2% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.8% | Fair 14.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Czechoslovakian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Czechoslovakian |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.1% | Exceptional 46.6% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Average 2.5% |