Immigrants from Russia vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,481,887 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to a decrease of 2.8 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $43,806, a difference of 18.8%), median female earnings ($44,680 compared to $38,738, a difference of 15.3%), and median earnings ($53,457 compared to $46,658, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $60,581, a difference of 6.5%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $51,224, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 23.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.0%), poverty (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.7%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 18.0%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (63.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 92.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 33.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 8.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 18.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 43.6%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 40.7%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.87%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.6%).