Chickasaw vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Czechoslovakian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Czechoslovakians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czechoslovakian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,243,182 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.491. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 77.5 Czechoslovakians.
Chickasaw vs Czechoslovakian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $101,387, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $95,070, a difference of 22.0%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $84,965, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.8%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,738, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $60,581, a difference of 12.8%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Czechoslovakian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Average $43,806 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Average $103,273 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Average $84,965 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Average $46,658 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Good $55,382 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Poor $38,738 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $51,224 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Average $95,070 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Good $101,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Average $60,581 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 28.2% |
Chickasaw vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 35.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 33.1%), and male poverty (13.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.7%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 13.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Czechoslovakian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Good 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Good 16.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Fair 21.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chickasaw vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Czechoslovakian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chickasaw vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Czechoslovakian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 41.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Good 83.0% |
Chickasaw vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.5%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.35%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Czechoslovakian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Excellent 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Fair 32.0% |
Chickasaw vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.050%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Czechoslovakian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Chickasaw vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.1%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.2%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Czechoslovakian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Good 65.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 14.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Chickasaw vs Czechoslovakian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 36.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 9.9%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.0%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Czechoslovakian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.6% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Average 2.5% |