Immigrants from Latvia vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,983,682 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.491. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.331% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 331.4 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $43,806, a difference of 16.2%), median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $38,738, a difference of 11.3%), and median family income ($114,826 compared to $103,273, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $51,224, a difference of 1.0%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $60,581, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.2%), single female poverty (19.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.54%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and poverty (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.1%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.2%), births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.21%), family households (62.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 54.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 38.8%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.1%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.84%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.1%).