Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 336,603,047 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($106,057 compared to $84,965, a difference of 24.8%), median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $55,382, a difference of 24.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($116,626 compared to $95,070, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $51,224, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $60,581, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 27.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 26.7%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.97%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 29.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.2%), and divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (50.0% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (66.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.92%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 46.8%), master's degree (20.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 42.7%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and 11th grade (93.6% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.1%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 37.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 11.7%).