Immigrants from Vietnam vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 300,581,362 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Vietnam communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.272. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Vietnam within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Vietnam corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Vietnam and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 11.7%), householder income under 25 years ($55,562 compared to $51,224, a difference of 8.5%), and median household income ($91,987 compared to $84,965, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,913 compared to $55,382, a difference of 0.85%), per capita income ($43,229 compared to $43,806, a difference of 1.3%), and median earnings ($47,282 compared to $46,658, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Vietnam and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.7%), single father poverty (14.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 20.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.24%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Vietnam and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.2%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Vietnam and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Vietnam and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 9.5%), family households with children (29.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.59%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Vietnam and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 20.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Vietnam and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 105.5%), high school diploma (86.2% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and ged/equivalency (83.2% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (37.1% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 0.34%), associate's degree (45.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Vietnam and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.5%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 24.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 0.23%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.3%).