Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,285,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.434. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 40.0 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 11.3%), per capita income ($47,394 compared to $43,806, a difference of 8.2%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $38,738, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $51,224, a difference of 1.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $95,070, a difference of 3.0%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $55,382, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 8.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.090%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 13.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 5.6%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.5%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 20.2%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.7%).