Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,600,710 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.099% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 98.9 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,983 compared to $43,806, a difference of 14.1%), median household income ($96,292 compared to $84,965, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,650 compared to $95,070, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $51,224, a difference of 5.8%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $60,581, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.30%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.69%), and receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 17.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.0%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 73.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.3%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.1%), and professional degree (5.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.79%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.8%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 29.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.37%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.4%).