Immigrants from Taiwan vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 235,925,351 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Taiwan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Taiwan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Taiwan corresponds to an increase of 23.3 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($116,460 compared to $84,965, a difference of 37.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($129,122 compared to $95,070, a difference of 35.8%), and median male earnings ($74,031 compared to $55,382, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($59,424 compared to $51,224, a difference of 16.0%), and median female earnings ($49,256 compared to $38,738, a difference of 27.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 45.1%), receiving food stamps (7.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 40.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 35.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 39.2%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.3%), and single mother households (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.6%), currently married (50.7% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (68.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 78.5%), professional degree (7.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 68.0%), and master's degree (22.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (91.0% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.10%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and 11th grade (93.6% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (7.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (15.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.3%).