Immigrants from Latin America vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 363,487,384 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.722. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,823 compared to $43,806, a difference of 19.0%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 18.8%), and median family income ($86,989 compared to $103,273, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $51,224, a difference of 0.32%), median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $38,738, a difference of 9.7%), and median household income ($75,420 compared to $84,965, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 65.6%), receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 52.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 34.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.2%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (67.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and married-couple households (44.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.39%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 102.8%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 37.4%), and master's degree (11.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 25.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.8%).