Lumbee vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lumbee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lumbee

Czechoslovakians

Poor
Good
2,002
SOCIAL INDEX
17.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
276th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czechoslovakian Integration in Lumbee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,758,053 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Czechoslovakians.
Lumbee Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

Lumbee vs Czechoslovakian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $95,070, a difference of 57.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($65,113 compared to $101,387, a difference of 55.7%), and median household income ($54,644 compared to $84,965, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $38,738, a difference of 19.2%), median earnings ($36,876 compared to $46,658, a difference of 26.5%), and wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 32.2%).
Lumbee vs Czechoslovakian Income
Income MetricLumbeeCzechoslovakian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$29,845
Average
$43,806
Median Family Income
Tragic
$68,679
Average
$103,273
Median Household Income
Tragic
$54,644
Average
$84,965
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,876
Average
$46,658
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$41,715
Good
$55,382
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,500
Poor
$38,738
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$34,584
Tragic
$51,224
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$60,305
Average
$95,070
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$65,113
Good
$101,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$40,550
Average
$60,581
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.3%
Tragic
28.2%

Lumbee vs Czechoslovakian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 122.8%), family poverty (17.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 112.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 108.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 45.4%), single female poverty (33.0% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 54.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 55.4%).
Lumbee vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
Poverty MetricLumbeeCzechoslovakian
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.1%
Good
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
26.3%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
33.3%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
30.7%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Tragic
25.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
33.0%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
28.5%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.2%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
10.3%

Lumbee vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 79.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 68.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.1%).
Lumbee vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLumbeeCzechoslovakian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.2%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.8%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.1%

Lumbee vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 35.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 9.7%).
Lumbee vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLumbeeCzechoslovakian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
56.8%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.6%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
41.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
65.5%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
78.3%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.3%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.0%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.6%
Good
83.0%

Lumbee vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 54.6%), births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 50.4%), and married-couple households (39.6% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.5%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.6%).
Lumbee vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLumbeeCzechoslovakian
Family Households
Tragic
63.1%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.6%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.8%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
48.2%
Fair
32.0%

Lumbee vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 7.0%).
Lumbee vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLumbeeCzechoslovakian
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.9%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.1%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
7.1%

Lumbee vs Czechoslovakian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 70.9%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 64.4%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%).
Lumbee vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
Education Level MetricLumbeeCzechoslovakian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.7%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.2%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
48.9%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
34.1%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.8%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.3%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.5%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.1%
Fair
1.8%

Lumbee vs Czechoslovakian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 49.6%), and ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.1%).
Lumbee vs Czechoslovakian Disability
Disability MetricLumbeeCzechoslovakian
Disability
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.7%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.2%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
3.4%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Average
2.5%