Alaska Native vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,846,160 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to a decrease of 8.4 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 15.4%), median male earnings ($49,711 compared to $55,382, a difference of 11.4%), and per capita income ($39,558 compared to $43,806, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $60,581, a difference of 0.28%), median female earnings ($38,202 compared to $38,738, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $51,224, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 51.8%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.6%), and family poverty (10.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 4.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 65.5%), male unemployment (8.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 62.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 50.8%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.7%), and births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.69%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple households (45.6% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 122.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 26.1%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 25.1%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.030%), 8th grade (97.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and 6th grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 94.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 33.1%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.35%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.9%).