Armenian vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,164,677 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Armenian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Armenians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Armenians corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Armenian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 13.8%), per capita income ($48,287 compared to $43,806, a difference of 10.2%), and median female earnings ($42,212 compared to $38,738, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,656 compared to $60,581, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,179 compared to $51,224, a difference of 3.8%), and median male earnings ($58,134 compared to $55,382, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Armenian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 30.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 30.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.34%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Armenian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 30.3%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Armenian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 27.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Armenian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.2% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 22.2%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.5%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Armenian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.6%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.9%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.91%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 46.7%), self-care disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 38.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.6%).