Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Nigerian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Nigerians

Czechoslovakians

Poor
Good
1,996
SOCIAL INDEX
17.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
277th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czechoslovakian Integration in Nigerian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,827,136 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Nigerian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.569. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nigerians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nigerians corresponds to a decrease of 8.5 Czechoslovakians.
Nigerian Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 22.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,730 compared to $95,070, a difference of 8.4%), and per capita income ($41,026 compared to $43,806, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,641 compared to $38,738, a difference of 2.3%), median earnings ($45,532 compared to $46,658, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,992 compared to $60,581, a difference of 2.7%).
Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Income
Income MetricNigerianCzechoslovakian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,026
Average
$43,806
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,522
Average
$103,273
Median Household Income
Poor
$81,725
Average
$84,965
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,532
Average
$46,658
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$52,039
Good
$55,382
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,641
Poor
$38,738
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,416
Tragic
$51,224
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$87,730
Average
$95,070
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$95,492
Good
$101,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$58,992
Average
$60,581
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
28.2%

Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 27.3%), family poverty (10.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 26.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.57%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
Poverty MetricNigerianCzechoslovakian
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Good
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.4%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.1%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Fair
21.4%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.3%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.3%

Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and female unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.7%).
Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNigerianCzechoslovakian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.2%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.1%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.1%

Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.25%).
Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNigerianCzechoslovakian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.1%
Exceptional
41.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.7%
Good
83.0%

Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 30.3%), married-couple households (43.2% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 12.5%), and currently married (43.4% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (63.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNigerianCzechoslovakian
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Average
2.4%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
35.3%
Fair
32.0%

Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 54.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 16.9%).
Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNigerianCzechoslovakian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
7.1%

Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.6%), ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and high school diploma (88.2% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.47%), bachelor's degree (37.2% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.80%).
Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
Education Level MetricNigerianCzechoslovakian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.5%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.1%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.2%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Average
14.9%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Fair
1.8%

Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 34.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Nigerian vs Czechoslovakian Disability
Disability MetricNigerianCzechoslovakian
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Excellent
12.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.7%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Average
2.5%