Immigrants from Turkey vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Turkey
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Turkey

Czechoslovakians

Excellent
Good
8,861
SOCIAL INDEX
86.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
43rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czechoslovakian Integration in Immigrants from Turkey Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,266,106 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Turkey communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Turkey within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.241% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Turkey corresponds to an increase of 241.4 Czechoslovakians.
Immigrants from Turkey Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

Immigrants from Turkey vs Czechoslovakian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,368 compared to $43,806, a difference of 17.3%), median family income ($118,325 compared to $103,273, a difference of 14.6%), and median household income ($96,964 compared to $84,965, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,503 compared to $51,224, a difference of 2.5%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,672 compared to $60,581, a difference of 10.1%).
Immigrants from Turkey vs Czechoslovakian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from TurkeyCzechoslovakian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,368
Average
$43,806
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$118,325
Average
$103,273
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,964
Average
$84,965
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,960
Average
$46,658
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,728
Good
$55,382
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,066
Poor
$38,738
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,503
Tragic
$51,224
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$107,258
Average
$95,070
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$114,407
Good
$101,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,672
Average
$60,581
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
28.2%

Immigrants from Turkey vs Czechoslovakian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 15.2%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.32%), female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Turkey vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from TurkeyCzechoslovakian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Excellent
10.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Good
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.3%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.3%

Immigrants from Turkey vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.48%).
Immigrants from Turkey vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from TurkeyCzechoslovakian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.9%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Turkey vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.72%).
Immigrants from Turkey vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from TurkeyCzechoslovakian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
41.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.7%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Good
83.0%

Immigrants from Turkey vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.3%), births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (63.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Turkey vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from TurkeyCzechoslovakian
Family Households
Tragic
63.1%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.8%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.1%
Fair
32.0%

Immigrants from Turkey vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 46.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.5%).
Immigrants from Turkey vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from TurkeyCzechoslovakian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.6%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Turkey vs Czechoslovakian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 47.6%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.6%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.4% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.24%), high school diploma (90.6% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.37%).
Immigrants from Turkey vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from TurkeyCzechoslovakian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
65.2%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.4%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.0%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from Turkey vs Czechoslovakian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 28.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 7.6%).
Immigrants from Turkey vs Czechoslovakian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from TurkeyCzechoslovakian
Disability
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Average
2.5%