Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Trinidadians and Tobagonians

Czechoslovakians

Poor
Good
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czechoslovakian Integration in Trinidadian and Tobagonian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,166,833 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to an increase of 16.0 Czechoslovakians.
Trinidadian and Tobagonian Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czechoslovakian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 45.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,357 compared to $101,387, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $60,581, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,820 compared to $46,658, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($52,631 compared to $51,224, a difference of 2.8%), and per capita income ($41,655 compared to $43,806, a difference of 5.2%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czechoslovakian Income
Income MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCzechoslovakian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,655
Average
$43,806
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,466
Average
$103,273
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,402
Average
$84,965
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,820
Average
$46,658
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,446
Good
$55,382
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,958
Poor
$38,738
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,631
Tragic
$51,224
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,856
Average
$95,070
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,357
Good
$101,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,327
Average
$60,581
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
28.2%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czechoslovakian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 55.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 50.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.14%), single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.54%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
Poverty MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCzechoslovakian
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Good
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.2%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.3%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.0%
Exceptional
10.3%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 37.5%), male unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 34.7%), and unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.8%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCzechoslovakian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.1%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 35.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.71%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCzechoslovakian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
41.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.5%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Good
83.0%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.1%), married-couple households (40.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 18.8%), and currently married (41.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.34%), family households (63.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCzechoslovakian
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.9%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.5%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.5%
Fair
32.0%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 203.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 67.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 21.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 46.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 59.5%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCzechoslovakian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.9%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.3%
Exceptional
7.1%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czechoslovakian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 60.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and college, under 1 year (61.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
Education Level MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCzechoslovakian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.9%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.6%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.7%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.8%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czechoslovakian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 42.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czechoslovakian Disability
Disability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCzechoslovakian
Disability
Average
11.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
23.9%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.2%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Average
2.5%