Immigrants from Caribbean vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 318,123,431 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.385. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 38.2%), householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $60,581, a difference of 24.8%), and median family income ($83,319 compared to $103,273, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $51,224, a difference of 0.92%), median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $38,738, a difference of 6.4%), and median earnings ($41,119 compared to $46,658, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 90.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 74.4%), and married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.68%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.7%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 34.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 42.3%), births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 24.3%), and married-couple households (40.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.030%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.13, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 150.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 60.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 14.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 35.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 49.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 79.3%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.8%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 36.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.43%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.8%).