Nicaraguan vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,359,534 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Nicaraguan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nicaraguans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nicaraguans corresponds to an increase of 9.8 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 20.3%), median male earnings ($49,215 compared to $55,382, a difference of 12.5%), and median family income ($92,231 compared to $103,273, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,275 compared to $51,224, a difference of 4.0%), median female earnings ($36,904 compared to $38,738, a difference of 5.0%), and median household income ($79,737 compared to $84,965, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 58.6%), receiving food stamps (16.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 56.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.010%), single mother poverty (29.8% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.8%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 29.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.0%), births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.2%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 23.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 81.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.4%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.6%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 30.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.8%).