Icelander vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,891,342 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.514% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 514.1 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,987 compared to $43,806, a difference of 2.7%), wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $60,581, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $51,224, a difference of 0.050%), median male earnings ($55,415 compared to $55,382, a difference of 0.060%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,560 compared to $95,070, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 17.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 0.72%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 34.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.070%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.80%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 5.7%), married-couple households (47.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.33%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 22.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.6%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.2%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 11.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.1%).