Mongolian vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,410,630 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.326. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 48.6 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,173 compared to $43,806, a difference of 12.2%), median family income ($114,553 compared to $103,273, a difference of 10.9%), and median household income ($93,971 compared to $84,965, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $51,224, a difference of 2.6%), wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $60,581, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.21%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.58%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 18.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 14.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 67.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 54.0%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 45.8%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.0% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.43%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 29.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.2%).